So Iran has no nuclear weapons. A surprising revelation? No, it should not be. The fact that Ahmewhatshisname was saying that until he was purple in the face did not stop the Bush empire from labeling he and Iran as evil.Do we believe that Bush just realized that Iran has no nuclear weapon capability? No, obviously not, he needs more people. The report was just released to the public, which means that it had be reviewed by the inner-circle some time ago. Just as before Bush has unapologetically deceived the public
Now that Bush has the gas face will he take back any of the things he said about Iran or ease some of the pressure? You guessed it again, nope! He actually wants to continue the pressure, because the report also highlighted the fact that sanctions are weakening Iran. There's nothing like being wrong and strong, but that is the hallmark of Bush's entire two-term presidency.
I get the distinct impression that everything the president and his cabinet does is right even when it's wrong because it's still right. If it were wrong, he would not tell us. He does not have to tell us because he is the commander in chief.
1 comment:
the good folks over in Iran did not get rid of there nuclear weapon ambitions until they saw that america meant business when they invaded Iraq in 2003. its obvious the president must maintain a hardline stance on a terror state to keep them in line; if it wasnt for his tough stance iran would probably have those nuclear weapons.
the part about president lying is an exxageration. you can make the case that he was wrong on wmd's in iraq but so was the rest of the world leaders. being wrong is not the same as lying. saddam Hussien needed to be removed from power he supported terrorism and conducted mass murder on his own people.
Post a Comment